Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Without the Mormon Lens: 1 - Introduction

 "I don't think Joseph Smith was a prophet"

    Tears that I had been holding back finally broke free as I said the words I never thought I would say. The fear, the anger, the betrayal. The emotions that countless people who have lost their faith had felt, were rushing through me. I collapsed to the floor as this great realization washed over me.

    I  had lost my faith. 

    It was gone.

    I don't feel that it is important to share the events that led to my faith crisis, and honestly they are hard to explain. Like most people who leave the church, there were a number of issues that had piled up over the years. Items that were stacked on my shelf of concerns eventually became too much for the shelf to handle. It broke, and with it, my world shattered.

    The grief was overwhelming. I had known nothing but Mormonism for my entire life, and the loss was the feeling of losing a loved one. An entire half of myself, a huge part of my identity... vanished.

    My wife was kind and understanding. She had patiently waited for me to return from my mission, and at my request, had become baptized as a member of the church. Although she was never truly converted, she knew what the gospel meant to me. And for her love and support, I will always be grateful.

    Time passed and I had slowly become more accustomed to no longer calling myself a Mormon. I had been through therapy, had gotten my anger out on some online forums, and felt that I was in a good place.

    However, one day I was going through my storage unit when I came across my box of memorabilia from my mission. I don't really know why I kept it. I had thrown my garments away the summer before, and had thrown away all anything else related to the church as well. For whatever reason I still had this box. I opened it up to find my copy of Preach My Gospel, the Standard Works, some other odds and ends, and... a few copies of the pamphlets we used in discussions. 

    I stared for a moment at a copy of a booklet that taught the Plan of Salvation. I knew it well. I had taught that lesson countless times. But staring at it now, it felt foreign to me. I thumbed through the pages as the pit in my stomach grew. I recognized the pictures, I remembered all of the words. But they meant nothing to me.

    I thought back to a time as a missionary when I had stumbled across a tract left behind by a Jehovah's Witness. I thumbed through those pages back then and felt the same nothingness that I felt now. The art that mattered to someone else, was just another painting of Jesus. The lessons that changed someone's life were just words on a page. For the first time since walking away I was faced with an uncomfortable reality. 

    I had lost my Mormon lens. 

    I  could not see the church in the same way that I did as a member. 

    Now, I don't know why this little book triggered this thought. I had stood off to the side during Sunday dinners and watched while everyone bowed their heads to pray. I had attended baby blessings and spent time with Mormon friends despite no longer attending their ward. All of which required a mental disconnect to keep family and friend relationships going. But this? This was personal. This was me, standing alone in the back corner of a storage unit, face to face with a past I had walked away from.

    I have thought often about this moment, and have acknowledged the feelings any time they arise. It breaks my heart to know that I am not alone in this feeling. Countless people lose their Mormon lens, their reality has changed, and there wasn't anything I could do about it.

    Eventually I started posting on social media in an effort to make content that is relatable to those of us who leave. I enjoy it, and I am comforted in knowing that I am helping others come to terms with this new world view, even if some don't see it that way.

    I've been thinking about the Mormon lens for a while now, and its in the back of my mind when I make my posts on Instagram. I try not to feel hurt when members of the church don't see things the same way that those who left do. Why would they? They still see the world from the eyes of a Mormon, I see it through the eyes as someone who walked away.

    I have decided to take one more step in my journey outside the church. I am going to study the Book of Mormon one last time. From beginning to end. Not from the eyes of a believing member of the church, but as someone who now sees with a different perspective. I love the Book of Mormon, but I cannot make myself see it as the work of God. 

    I started this study a few weeks ago and feel strongly that I need to share my findings and my perspectives to the public sphere. I currently have finished my own analysis of the First Book of Nephi and feel confident in saying that it is nothing but a product of the time, and that Joseph Smith was a talented storyteller. 

    This brief post serves as an introduction of sorts to this project.  As much as I want to jump right in, I will be sharing one or two additional posts leading up to the actual content of the Book of Mormon. It is important to me that I present the book in the literary sphere that  I believe it exists in. Not as scripture, but as a historical fiction, brought about by the interests of Joseph Smith's time. That takes some time to explain and my message will be lost if I don't

    It is my hope that I will be able to present a new perspective of the Book of Mormon in a way that can help those of you who may still be wondering how it was possible, and where the words came from. I may not have the answers to everything, but I am making every attempt to be thorough, yet honest in my thoughts and conclusions. 

    Its entirely possible that I will reach a dead end, and call it a loss. But we'll cross that bridge when we get there.

    At this point I'm just rambling. So until next time, I bid you Adios

-Mason




- Next Post - 

2 - Changing our Perspective

The idea that deconstruction begins with an openness to fresh perspective, a different lens.


    


Comments

  1. Great post, thank you for sharing. That grief is overwhelming. It’s a death and a rebirth and it’s devastating and wonderful at the same time. Looking forward to more posts!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

Mormonism's Complicated History With Caffeine

Ask whether Latter-day Saints can drink caffeine and the current answer is yes. The Church’s own historical summary says caffeine has been “left to the judgment of individual Saints” and is not prohibited as a condition for receiving a temple recommend. [3] That answer is clearer today than it was for much of the twentieth century. Church leaders and publications repeatedly discussed caffeine as a drug, a poison, a potentially habit-forming substance, and at times as the apparent reason coffee and tea were objectionable. Some leaders extended that reasoning directly to cola drinks. In 1965, the First Presidency even told a bishop that decaffeinated coffee did not violate the Word of Wisdom and should not disqualify an otherwise worthy member from a temple recommend.[5] The result was a long period in which formal policy, medical explanation, and everyday Mormon culture did not always point in exactly the same direction. That history helps explain why older and younger Latter-day Saints...

How the Book of Mormon Has Changed Since 1830

     Discussion of changes to the Book of Mormon often settles into two opposing claims: either the book has remained essentially unchanged since 1830, or later editors rewrote it beyond recognition. The reality is that both positions carry a bit of truth. Although the main narrative remains recognizable, the book has changed in several distinct ways. Its wording and grammar were revised in the early editions.⁶ , ⁷ The chapter and verse system was reorganized in 1879, while chapter summaries were added in 1920.¹⁹ Those summaries and other study aids were revised again in 2013 and 2025.²⁰ , ²¹ Following these changes in chronological order makes their differences easier to see. The history begins with dictation in 1829 and continues through the original and printer’s manuscripts, the 1830 printing, Joseph Smith’s revisions, and the later editorial committees that produced the modern edition. Tracing that sequence also makes it possible to distinguish changes to the script...

Mormon Stories Fires Back: The Core Defenses Against the LDS Lawsuit

In April 2026, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its intellectual property arm, Intellectual Reserve, filed a federal lawsuit against the Open Stories Foundation and John Dehlin. The complaint alleges trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and consumer confusion arising from the use of the name Mormon Stories, its branding, and its use of Church-related images.      The Church portrays the case as a straightforward effort to protect its trademarks and prevent confusion among people seeking information about the faith. Mormon Stories sees the case very differently. In its response and counterclaim , the organization argues that the Church is attempting to claim ownership over a word that belongs to an entire religious movement while using intellectual property law against one of its most visible critics. Here are the major arguments at the center of the dispute.

Everything You Need to Know About the Salt Lake Temple

  The Salt Lake Temple will open to the public from April 5 through October 1, 2027, before it is rededicated and again restricted to Latter-day Saints with temple recommends. [2] Reservations opened on September 1, 2026, and one million tour spaces were claimed in less than 24 hours. [1] The Church describes the event as only the second public open house in the temple’s 134-year history. [2] The building visitors will enter is both old and substantially new. [12] [13] Construction began in 1853 and ended with the temple’s dedication in April 1893, but the interior has been altered repeatedly since then. [3] [20] The current renovation adds about 100,000 square feet of underground space, two baptistries instead of one, five instruction rooms, and 22 sealing rooms instead of 13. [12] The temple now rests on 98 base isolators about 20 feet below the structure, part of a seismic system designed to allow substantial horizontal movement during a major earthquake. [14] [24] The chan...

Mormonism and the Satanic Ritual Abuse Scare of the 1980s

       All right. So, for this post today, I’m going to be talking about a pretty sensitive subject. And that’s going to be satanic ritual abuse and potential ties to leadership of the Mormon church.      It should go without saying that this is going to be a little bit more of a sensitive subject. I’ll say up front that I have no intention of diving into specific examples—detailed descriptions of what satanic ritual abuse looks like—outside of broad definitions. My goal is just to give an idea of what makes ritual abuse a little bit different than regular abuse (for lack of a better word). Consider this your heads up that this is going to be a sensitive subject.      I typically wouldn’t really give this type of subject very much attention. I certainly never planned on making a post about it. But I did have an interesting conversation the other day with an LDS content creator that I message with sometimes. I was a little surprised whe...

Visualization of the LDS Canon

Around the 1230s, Hugh of Saint-Cher and a team of Dominican scholars produced the first Bible concordance, working through the Latin Vulgate and recording where its words appeared. Because modern verse numbers did not yet exist, the compilers divided chapters into smaller lettered sections so readers could locate an occurrence. Printing made the method far more useful. John Marbeck published the first complete concordance to the English Bible in 1550 . Alexander Cruden's Complete Concordance followed in 1737 and became one of the best-known English Bible reference works. The basic structure remained familiar for centuries: choose a word, then receive a list of passages where it occurs. Latter-day Saints soon adopted the same approach for their own scriptures. In 1900, George Reynolds published A Complete Concordance to the Book of Mormon in Salt Lake City. The 852-page volume was the product of roughly twenty years of work and classified the words of the Book of Mormon so reade...

No. The Mormon Church is Not Suddenly Opposed to Gambling

Almost immediately after President D. Todd Christofferson said, “Gambling is morally wrong,” during the October 2026 General Conference, the LDS apologetic account @allthoseinfavor reacted as though the Church had just drawn a new moral line on gambling. Which personally is a bit concerning, seeing as the account runs a podcast discussing all aspects of Mormonism, including the history of the church. So I find it hard to believe that they haven't ever encountered the anti-gambling position of the church in their studies. Christofferson’s talk was certainly timely. He described a world in which smartphones have made sports betting, casino-style games, and prediction markets available almost anywhere, and he warned against treating an occasional wager as harmless entertainment.[1] But the moral judgment itself was not new. In fact, the Church had used almost the same words more than a century earlier. In August 1908, Church President Joseph F. Smith addressed speculation and gambling...