Skip to main content

Without the Mormon Lens: 3 - And it Came to Pass

     As I discussed in my previous post, my theory is that the Book of Mormon is a psuedo-biblical historical fiction. I believe that it is a work which was influenced by other writings in this genre and the history of America.

    In order to explore this concept a little more, we need to first understand how widespread these types of works were in the United States. And in order to do that, we need to first go to London, where psuedo-biblicia first captured the public's attention.

     In 1740, William of Malmesbury published a book telling the history of the Kings of England in a biblical style, or "the manner of The Jewish Historians." Titled The Chronicle of the Kings of England It was published in multiple editions and spread quickly to the United States.

Cover page from the 1821 edition

     The book quickly gained notoriety for its unique approach to retelling English history. It was designed to mock the grandiosity and style of biblical texts while recounting the history of England's kings, which gave it a distinctive and enduring appeal. It has been described in modern critiques as a "most successful" example of blending historical narrative with satire.

   I'll share some content from the Book below (the 1821 edition) to give you an idea of the style that Dodsely adopted.

Introduction to Richard II

Excerpt about Edward the First

The Commonwealth 

The Commonwealth continued...


     The book was even reprinted in an "enlarged version" specifically for young readers.

Cover Page from the  1799 Enlarged Version

Introduction to Richard II

Excerpt from Henry V

Excerpt from Anne

     You get the idea. It's history, but it's presented as biblical. This type of writing has been given multiple names. Including the style of antiquity, biblical style, King James style, etc... I encompass all of into the term "psuedo-biblical." Because it looks biblical, it sounds biblical... but it isn't.

    Following the success of the work and others in England and in the States, we see a huge influx of psuedo-biblical works begin to flood newspapers around the country. Similar to the one I shared in my previous post. There were so many in fact, that attempting to interpret all of them or even read all of them would take significantly more effort than one person could devote. Here are several examples from newspapers around the country.





    Those three articles are very brief examples, a simple search for "and it came to pass" or other similar phrases on the Chronicling America website, or other databases, will give you an idea of just how many of these there are. You will find (in addition to regular biblical verses) news, fictional stories, satire, history and more. These are found in nearly every newspaper I have searched through in nearly every state. 

    It should come as no surprise that, despite copywrite laws, the Book of Mormon itself was partially published in a Palmyra newspaper by Abner Cole (under the pseudonym Obadiah Dogberry Esq.)



    This style of writing was so common in fact, that Cole initially criticized Joseph Smith in a psuedo-biblical style as the Book of Pukei


     Going forward, this is the context and the environment that we will be reading the Book of Mormon in as I present the rest of my research. To put it plainly:

"When Joseph Smith published the Book of Mormon in 1830, Americans had been producing and consuming faux-biblical texts for close to a century. As we have seen, American colonials, who first merely reissued English pieces, imitating a practice that had originated as a satirical literary genre in the first half of the eighteenth century in Britain, started publishing original pseudobiblical texts in earnest during the Revolution...

"...While the practice of imitating the biblical style to convey reality appears extraordinary to modern readers, it came naturally to generations of Americans writing and reading pseudobiblical texts, Joseph Smith and his audience included. The numerous texts written in biblical idiom, some of which were, as we have just seen, major and hugely popular literary productions, attest to the vigor of that distinct American tradition." - Eran Shalev, American Zion

    Of course, psuedo-biblicia doesn't stop at newspaper publications. In my next two posts I will be discussing several books that circulated America in this style. One in particular I believe had major influence over the Book of Mormon. (And no... it's not the Late War. Although you may find this comparison interesting) 

Check Your Understanding:

Test what you picked up from this post.

1. What theory is the author exploring about the Book of Mormon?




2. Where did pseudo-biblical writing first gain major public attention?




3. What was distinctive about The Chronicle of the Kings of England?




4. What does the term “pseudo-biblical” mean in this context?




5. What does the widespread presence of pseudo-biblical writing in early America suggest?




6. Who published portions of the Book of Mormon in a Palmyra newspaper before its release?




7. According to Eran Shalev, why did pseudo-biblical writing come naturally to early Americans?






 

- Next Post - 

4 -Biblical America

The early fascination of Americans and Biblical language.


New here? Consider starting at the first post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...

Is Mormonism a Cult?

     The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes.       The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.      One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence: B ehavior I nformation T hought E motion.       Each form of control helps a system maintain stabil...

Are Mormons Christian?

People keep asking whether Mormons are Christian, as if that’s the issue that matters. It’s not. Mormons love this question since its probably one of the tamest aspects of the faith to question. The other day I was reading some comments on an online post that was debating the issue of whether or not Mormons were Christian, and this interaction caught my eye. One individual declared that the FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) “never were and never will be Mormon.”  Now, I can't imagine that many Mormons will share this same sentiment, considering that the FLDS church literally emerged from the exact same roots as the Utah church. But this interaction ironically demonstrates the exact same mindset that other Christians have about Mormons. Some Christians don’t consider Mormons Christian because Latter-day Saint teachings reject key doctrines established by early Christian creeds, like the Trinity, original sin, and the belief that Go...