Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Sydney Australia Mortdale Stake Pilot Program: Informed Consent


The following email was sent to the Sydney Australia Mortdale Stake on Sunday Oct, 28th 2024 by an  individual (likely using an alias) who pretended to be distributing an official church statement.

-----------------

Sydney Australia Mortdale Stake
Pilot Program: Informed Consent

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

I have some wonderful news, your Stake has been chosen to trial a new approach to learning about the Gospel.

As you know our leaders are trying to be more transparent with some of the messiness in our history. No doubt you have all started to notice this with the release of the Gospel Topics Essays (https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics-essays/essays?lang=eng) 10 years ago and videos of President Nelson showing us how Joseph translated the Book of Mormon, with his face in a white stove pipe hat, with a seer stone.

This pilot program will involve two different objectives. The first is for our beloved missionaries to ensure that all converts are fully informed before they commit to baptism, with no more milk before meat. The second is for all members to go through a short lesson, to make sure they are fully informed about our history. Too many of our members are discovering our difficult history on ex-mormon websites and podcasts and it is sadly leading them astray. The brethren’s hope is that if you are gently informed from faithful sources only, that hopefully we can all weather this storm together.

The brethren have also noticed that a number of worrying beliefs have crept in that are not backed by doctrine or come from the mouths of our Prophets, so they are wanting to clear the decks and ensure that some of the more troubling beliefs, being whispered around the halls, are finally put to rest.

Below you will see a number of points that will then link to supporting information on the Church's websites. If you don’t have much time, feel free just to read the below, rather than viewing the websites and looking into all the footnotes/source material to get the full faithful picture.

So take a deep breath and lets dive in at the deep end.

We are not getting our own planets, this is not in our scriptures, nor is it doctrine. Church News FAQ No 12.

We are not becoming a God. Church News FAQ No 11.

The Book of Abraham is sadly not what Joseph claimed it was. The Gospel Topics Essa on the subject states we have the papyrus that it was translated from. The translation is 100% incorrect, does not mention Abraham at all and the papyrus was created thousands of years after Abraham lived. It was therefore not written by Abrahams own hand as the introduction to the Book of Abraham states.

Joseph ‘translated’ the characters above the figures in the facsimiles, but they are all sadly wrong, eliminating any possible claim to a missing scroll theory. The Joseph Smith Papers project also shows how the facsimiles were doctored to remove some of the real Egyptian content, that did not fit with the Abraham narrative. eg the presence of Anubis in facsimile 3 (far left character with a jackal snout, removed prior to printing). The brethren are prayerfully considering de-canonising the Book of Abraham, which would then sadly eliminate all of our unique pre-existence knowledge.

Joseph Smith married 30-40 women. Footnote 24

12-14 of these women were already married to other righteous men. Footnote 29

The youngest was 14. Gospel Topics Essay 

He was intimate with his wives and possibly had 2-3 children with them. Footnote 25 and body of Gospel Topics Essay.

Joseph Smith instigated polygamy, not God, as it was Joseph who after reading about it in the old testament, asked the lord if he could put it into practice in 1831. After Joseph was already practicing polygamy with multiple women, Joseph warned others that if they would not marry him an angel with a drawn sword would end his life.

Polygamy is still in our doctrine and will be part of our lives in the eternities. Brigham Young stated that the only men who become Gods will be those that enter into polygamy. Joseph F. Smith made it clear it was essential for the salvation and exaltation of mankind. John Taylor  in referring to Joseph Smiths revelation stated the keys of the kingdom would be removed from those who did not practice it. President Nelson and Oaks are both currently sealed to two women and will be with both of them in the Celestial Kingdom.

D&C132  contains all the doctrine for practicing polygamy. Sadly all of these rules were broken by Joseph. Not all the wives were virgins (one was six months pregnant) and Emma wasn’t told about most of them. Only a few children came from the unions. Emma was also threatened with death multiple times in D&C 132 if she did not comply, which denied her any free agency in the practicing of polygamy.

The Book of Mormon was translated using a rock in a hat. This was the same method Joseph used right before to attempt to locate buried treasure for others, while sadly never finding any. He was in trouble with the law for this fraudulent practice.

Joseph Smith plagiarised the Joseph Smith translation of the bible from Adam Clarkes Commentary on the Bible. BYU.

There are multiple versions of the first vision, that contradict each other about important details (who visited, Josephs age, reason why etc) Gospel Topics Essays. It is true that it was a common idea in that part of the world and at that time in history, to claim to have had a first vision. Many other people had their accounts published before Josephs like Norris Stearns (1815), Elias Smith (1816), Asa Wild (1823), Solomon Chamberlain (1816), James G Marsh  and Charles G. Finney (1821).

Multiple prophets and apostles have stated in the Journal of Discourses that it was only an angel that visited Joseph that day. Some make it clear that God and Jesus never visited Joseph. Orson Hyde JOD Vol.6 p335 , Brigham Young JOD Vol.2 170-171 , Wilford Woodruff JOD Vol.2 196-197 , Heber C Kimball JOD Vol.6 p29, John Taylor JOD Vol.10 p127, George A Smith JOD Vol.12 333-334, George A. Smith JOD Vol.13 77-78.

There are multiple statements from the three Witnesses where they admit they only saw the plates in their imaginations, not with their physical eyes. Gospel Topics.

It is possible that Oliver Cowdrey denied his testimony of the Book of Mormon. This is only a second-hand source though, but it was published in a church run newspaper at the time. BYU 

It was Nephi and not Moroni who visited Joseph and directed him to locate the Gold Plates. Times and Seasons Vol III 753 , Millennial Star Vol 3 p71, Biographical Sketches p79 , Pearl of Great Price 1851, p41.

Joseph was not illiterate in 1830. 1829 letter1831 Letter, Ensign Article.

He used to give 'amusing' recitals to his family, about the ancient inhabitants of the land before he received the golden plates. Joseph Smith Papers Project.

Joseph Smith substantially changed the wording of an earlier revelation when he compiled the 1835 Doctrine & Covenants, inserting multiple verses that contained the entire priesthood restoration. None of it was in the original published Book of Commandments revelation.

Joseph accidentally translated Matthew Chapter 26 twice, three months apart, for the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible. Sadly there are no similarities between each attempt. 1st Attempt , 2nd Attempt.

In the April 1990 General Conference, President Nelson first discussed the use of the term Mormon and wanting to have the full name of the church be used instead. Then in the October 1990 General Conference President Hinkley  appeared to disagree with President Nelson. He stated that Mormon meant ‘More Good’ and that we should be proud to use that name. Joseph Smith also gave us the literal translation of the word Mormon and stated it means ‘More Good’. It is possible in the future, that the word Mormon will be more commonly used.

The exaltation and priesthood ban that was imposed upon some of our members for 126 years, was sadly because of the personal racist beliefs of past prophets of our church. They were not because dark coloured skin is an indication of divine disfavour or because of any actions in the pre-existence. Although Brigham Young stated that black people will not get the priesthood until the millennium, after every white man has had the opportunity, he was just speaking as a man (Footnote 9).

In 1907 President Joseph F Smith taught that the church expects to see the day when they will no longer require any tithing from us, as they will have sufficient to run the church. Our church now makes more in interest from its prudent investments every year than it needs to run the church. For those then that are struggling in these difficult times, please consider Lorenzo Snows comments in 1899 ‘I plead with you in the name of the Lord, and I pray that every man, woman and child who has means shall pay one tenth of their income as a tithing’.


I am sure we are all aware now, that the Book of Mormon has a troubling number of anachronisms in it. There are large amounts of text and ideas, from multiple documents, all published between 400AD and 1830 that have been found in the Book of Mormon and sadly most of them cannot be argued away.

The Book of Mormon also quotes from many New Testament verses (examples below), which of course could not have been found in the Brass plates.
* 2 Nephi 2:5  quotes Romans 3:20 , even though Lehi lived 600 years before Paul.
* Helaman 5:8 refers to the Sermon on the Mount, but it was written 60 years before the Sermon on the Mount occurred.
* Mormon 9:24  quotes from Mark 16:17-18. Mark 16:9-20 was a much later addition to the New Testament (early 2nd century).
* 1 Nephi 22:15, 23-24 and 2 Nephi 25:13  quote from Malachi 4:1-2, even though Nephi lived 200 years before Malachi.
* Alma 7:24  refers to 1 Corinthians 13:13 and 2 Corinthians 9:8 , even though Alma lived 100 years before they were written.

The brethren are slowly moving towards the idea of the Book of Mormon being an inspired work created by Joseph Smith, rather than a literal history of the ancient inhabitants of the American continent. This allows for him to have included so many ideas/stories from his immediate surroundings in the work.
* Speaking at the 2016 Mission Presidents Seminar, President Nelson said of the Book of Mormon, “It is not a textbook of history… It is not a record of all former inhabitants of the Western Hemisphere.”
* At April 2020 general conference, Elder Ulisses Soares, speaking about the coming forth of the Book of Mormon, said it “was not ‘translated’ in the traditional way that scholars would translate ancient texts by learning an ancient language. We ought to look at the process more like a ‘revelation.’”
* On October 22, 2021, at a member gathering in Amman, Jordan, Elder David A. Bednar of the Twelve said, “The Book of Mormon is not a book of history.”. He also made similar comments in his October 2024 General Conference talk.


DNA Evidence (https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics-essays/book-of-mormon-and-dna-studies?lang=eng) has shown conclusively that American Indians come from Siberia and not from the Middle East. This discovery then led to the introduction (https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/introduction?lang=eng) of the Book of Mormon being altered to say that Lamanites are among the ancestors of the American Indians, rather than saying they are the principal ancestors, as it said previously.

The revelation for the word of wisdom can be found in D&C 89. It is true that the revelation does specifically allow for beer drinking (mild drinks made of barley). It is common knowledge of course that Joseph and Brigham were known to drink and sell alcohol. The word of wisdom is also clear in relation to the fact that meat should be eaten only sparingly, only in times of winter or of cold, or famine. It is also clear on hot drinks of any sort being ‘not for the body or belly’.

It is sadly a myth that our endowment ceremony is related in any way to Solomons Temple. The masonic rituals that our endowment was based upon, originated in early modern Europe ie 1450-1789AD. It contains identical hand-shakes/symbols/similar wording/stonemasons apron/set square (L), compass (V) and ruler (—) etc.

On top of the endowment ceremony there is a second, more sacred ritual called the second anointing, or more commonly known as having your ‘calling and election made sure’. Usually it is reserved for Stake Presidents/Mission Presidents and higher up callings. It is for those who have done enough already in this life and are therefore granted eternal exaltation now. As has been requested though in our manuals we need to exercise caution when discussing this sacred ritual and not answer any questions in relation to it.

Brothers and Sisters, I know some of the above might have been hard to read directly from our Church’s website. However, as we eliminate some of the more troubling aspects of our faith and move a little closer to a more mainstream Christian ideal and beliefs, we hope you will come with us on this exciting journey.

It’s the brethren's sincere hope that this information will be openly discussed amongst members in our region, who should not be afraid to come to your leaders/teachers/peers with questions about the above. To know this information and not share it amongst those who have devoted their lives to our beautiful faith, would indeed be profoundly immoral.

Sincerely,
Phillip L Matheison
Research Information Division 
 

Check Your Understanding:

Test what you remember from the post.

1. What was the primary tactic used by the sender of the Mortdale Stake email?




2. According to the email, what was the supposed purpose of the “pilot program”?




3. Which official Church resource did the email reference multiple times?




4. The email claimed that Church leadership was considering what major doctrinal change?




5. What writing method did the email assert Joseph Smith used while translating the Book of Mormon?




6. What did the email suggest about future institutional framing of the Book of Mormon?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

The Peacemaker Summit and an Attempt to Silence Mormonism's Critics

 An upcoming event called the Peacemaker Summit , organized by The Holy Rebellion , is being promoted as a gathering for faithful LDS creators. The organizing vision for this event is explicitly about displacing critics of the faith by flooding social media platforms with coordinated, high-volume pro-Mormon content. That goal deserves scrutiny. My initial reaction to the original video The Stated Aim: Outnumber the Critics Travis Lish and Christian Williams from The Holy Rebellion have been clear about their motivation. They believe critics of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints dominate online spaces and that faithful voices need to overwhelm that presence. The solution being proposed is to create enough volume to hide criticisms from search results.  ... our goal is 1 billion views per month  collectively  as Latter Day Saint creators. Imagine a world where when you search Mormon or LDS or Joseph Smith  across any platform, what you would see...

How Does the Mormon Church Keep Finding Me?

The “Locating Members” page on the church’s Tech Wiki, now removed from the public site, explains that when a member moves without providing a new address, local leaders are expected to try to find out where that person went. The responsibility usually falls to the ward clerk, working under the direction of the bishop. The record isn’t automatically dropped just because attendance stops.  The full set of instructions is found below, but first, here are some points you need to consider about the religion systematically tracking down "lost" members. Form provided by the wiki First, the system does not recognize disengagement as a valid outcome. The wiki makes clear that when someone stops attending or moves without updating records, the organization treats this as missing data, not a personal decision. Silence is interpreted as a problem to solve. That alone creates an unhealthy dynamic because it removes a person’s ability to quietly exit. Second, the responsibility is instit...

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...

LDS Apologists Try to Beat a Dead Horse

It looks like the topic of horses and the Book of Mormon is going to crop up every few months like a nasty case of eczema, so I feel it’s worthwhile to summarize the debate as it currently stands. There's another post on this blog  about more recent research, but it always goes back to the (in)famous analysis done by Matthew Roper and his colleagues at BYU, John Clark and Wade Ardern, all the way back to 2005. But first, let's look even further back.  What the Book of Mormon Said The word “horse” appears 14 total times in the Book of Mormon in the context of domesticated livestock, with half of those references being connected with pulling chariots of war. Both Lamanite and Nephite peoples equated these horses with those described in Isaiah 2:7 and 5:28, which Nephi expressly quotes in his own record (compare 2 Nephi 12:7 and 15:28), with no distinction made between them. The horses of the Americas, per the Book of Mormon, are intended to be the same in form and function to ...

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
e
Link copied!