Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Stand Forever: A Response

Image
By Mason



In response to my thoughts regarding the 2013 study on the LDS Faith Crisis, I had someone suggest that I read a talk by Lawrence E Corbridge.


After a quick Google search, I found the talk they were referring to and wanted to share some thoughts on it.

Here is the relevent exerpt from Corbridge's 2022 BYU devotional:

----------
Primary Questions and Secondary Questions:

Begin by answering the primary questions. There are primary questions and there are secondary questions. Answer the primary questions first. Not all questions are equal and not all truths are equal. The primary questions are the most important. Everything else is subordinate. There are only a few primary questions. I will mention four of them.

1. Is there a God who is our Father?

2. Is Jesus Christ the Son of God, the Savior of the world?

3. Was Joseph Smith a prophet?

4. Is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints the kingdom of God on the earth?

By contrast, the secondary questions are unending. They include questions about Church history, polygamy, people of African descent and the priesthood, women and the priesthood, how the Book of Mormon was translated, the Pearl of Great Price, DNA and the Book of Mormon, gay marriage, the different accounts of the First Vision, and on and on.

Source: Lawrence E. Corbridge, Stand Forever, January 22 2019
https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/lawrence-e-corbridge/stand-for-ever/
 ----------

Okay... Wow. 
That is a lot to take in.

Upon reading his remarks, I immediately found the video footage and shared it on social media to gauge a general response. 

And I have to say, some of the comments absolutely hit the nail on the head with what the issues within this talk were.

This approach, presented by Corbridge, creates a false dichotomy between what it deems "primary" and "secondary" questions, which diminishes the importance of historical and doctrinal evidence in forming a coherent belief system. 

Here's why:

1. Primary and Secondary Questions Are Interconnected

His approach assumes that "primary" questions can be answered in isolation, independent of the "secondary" questions. However, many of the so-called secondary questions—such as those about polygamy, DNA and the Book of Mormon, and the different accounts of the First Vision—directly impact the credibility of the "primary" claims. For example:

If Joseph Smith is claimed to be a prophet, but historical evidence about polygamy or the translation of the Book of Mormon calls his actions or claims into question, it undermines the ability to affirm that primary question.

The truthfulness of the Church’s claims about being God’s kingdom on Earth hinges on the accuracy of its historical narratives and the morality of its practices.

Ignoring these interconnected issues suggests a willingness to base belief on incomplete or contradictory information, which undermines the pursuit of truth.


2. Truth Is Not Hierarchical

The argument implies that some truths are more important than others, but it does not explain why certain questions are elevated to "primary" status. For example:

Why should one conclude that Joseph Smith was a prophet without critically evaluating the historical and doctrinal claims associated with him, which are categorized as "secondary"?

If the "secondary" questions reveal contradictions, moral problems, or factual inaccuracies, they naturally call the "primary" conclusions into doubt.

Truth is holistic, and all questions must be weighed and considered because they collectively inform the validity of any religious claim.

3. Avoiding Difficult Questions Undermines Faith

This framework can encourage adherents to ignore difficult or uncomfortable questions by labeling them as "secondary" or "less important." However, faith built on avoiding scrutiny can feel fragile. For example:

A person might accept that Joseph Smith was a prophet, but if they later encounter well-documented issues like the Kinderhook Plates hoax, the evolving accounts of the First Vision, or the lack of archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon, their faith could be severely shaken. Thus challenging the "primary" question.

By discouraging critical engagement with these issues, the framework fosters a brittle faith rather than one rooted in thorough understanding.


Authentic belief is strengthened by wrestling with all questions, not just the ones that seem convenient or easy to answer.


4. It Creates an Arbitrary Standard

The categorization of questions into "primary" and "secondary" is arbitrary and subjective. Who decides which questions are primary and which are secondary? For someone deeply affected by issues like polygamy or LGBTQ+ teachings, those questions might feel as "primary" as the four listed. For example:

A person grappling with the Church's historical treatment of marginalized groups may find it difficult to reconcile the idea of the Church as "the kingdom of God on Earth" if those issues remain unresolved.

Elevating certain questions over others may reflect institutional priorities rather than an objective approach to truth.

5. A Lack of Transparency Reduces Credibility

By classifying challenging historical and doctrinal issues to the category of "secondary," the framework can come across as evasive or dismissive. People seeking truth often value transparency and integrity in addressing difficult questions. This approach can feel like an attempt to shield believers from inconvenient truths, which undermines the credibility of the organization promoting it.

A more honest and comprehensive approach would acknowledge that all questions—whether about God's existence, the role of Jesus, or Church history—are relevant to the pursuit of truth. Faith that is informed by rigorous inquiry and open to examining difficult issues is more resilient and trustworthy than faith built on avoiding or dismissing critical questions.

Ultimately, truth is robust enough to withstand scrutiny, and no question should be deemed unimportant in the search for it.

-Mason






----------

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you remember the key ideas from this post.

1. When was Lawrence E. Corbridge’s “Stand Forever” devotional delivered?




2. How many “primary questions” does Corbridge identify?




3. Which of the following is one of Corbridge’s “primary questions”?




4. According to the author, why can’t “secondary questions” be dismissed?




5. What is one of the author's central critiques of Corbridge’s framing?




6. What concern does the author raise about avoiding “secondary” issues?




7. Why does the author call the primary/secondary distinction arbitrary?




8. Why might dismissing difficult historical issues damage credibility?




9. What role do “secondary questions” play, according to the author?




10. What belief about truth does the author express at the end of the post?




Looking for reading suggestions?

Check out my growing list


Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

By Mason
Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...
Post a Comment
Read

The Peacemaker Summit and an Attempt to Silence Mormonism's Critics

By Mason
 An upcoming event called the Peacemaker Summit , organized by The Holy Rebellion , is being promoted as a gathering for faithful LDS creators. The organizing vision for this event is explicitly about displacing critics of the faith by flooding social media platforms with coordinated, high-volume pro-Mormon content. That goal deserves scrutiny. My initial reaction to the original video The Stated Aim: Outnumber the Critics Travis Lish and Christian Williams from The Holy Rebellion have been clear about their motivation. They believe critics of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints dominate online spaces and that faithful voices need to overwhelm that presence. The solution being proposed is to create enough volume to hide criticisms from search results.  ... our goal is 1 billion views per month  collectively  as Latter Day Saint creators. Imagine a world where when you search Mormon or LDS or Joseph Smith  across any platform, what you would see...
1 comment
Read

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

By Mason
  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...
Post a Comment
Read

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

How Does the Mormon Church Keep Finding Me?

By Mason
The “Locating Members” page on the church’s Tech Wiki, now removed from the public site, explains that when a member moves without providing a new address, local leaders are expected to try to find out where that person went. The responsibility usually falls to the ward clerk, working under the direction of the bishop. The record isn’t automatically dropped just because attendance stops.  The full set of instructions is found below, but first, here are some points you need to consider about the religion systematically tracking down "lost" members. Form provided by the wiki First, the system does not recognize disengagement as a valid outcome. The wiki makes clear that when someone stops attending or moves without updating records, the organization treats this as missing data, not a personal decision. Silence is interpreted as a problem to solve. That alone creates an unhealthy dynamic because it removes a person’s ability to quietly exit. Second, the responsibility is instit...
1 comment
Read

LDS Apologists Try to Beat a Dead Horse

By
It looks like the topic of horses and the Book of Mormon is going to crop up every few months like a nasty case of eczema, so I feel it’s worthwhile to summarize the debate as it currently stands. There's another post on this blog  about more recent research, but it always goes back to the (in)famous analysis done by Matthew Roper and his colleagues at BYU, John Clark and Wade Ardern, all the way back to 2005. But first, let's look even further back.  What the Book of Mormon Said The word “horse” appears 14 total times in the Book of Mormon in the context of domesticated livestock, with half of those references being connected with pulling chariots of war. Both Lamanite and Nephite peoples equated these horses with those described in Isaiah 2:7 and 5:28, which Nephi expressly quotes in his own record (compare 2 Nephi 12:7 and 15:28), with no distinction made between them. The horses of the Americas, per the Book of Mormon, are intended to be the same in form and function to ...
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

By
We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 4: Fanaticism

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found  here - The article titled “Fanaticism” was published on February 11, 1831, in the United States Gazette , a Philadelphia paper with national circulation. It reprints material from the Painesville Gazette , reflecting local reports from northeastern Ohio rather than direct investigation by the Gazette itself. The author is unnamed, consistent with early-19th-century newspaper practice, and the tone reflects mainstream Protestant skepticism toward emerging religious movements. The piece focuses on Kirtland and nearby areas in Geauga and Cuyahoga counties at a very early stage in Mormon development, less than a year after the Book of Mormon’s publica...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
1 comment
Read

With Apologies: Did Nephites Celebrate Christmas?

By
  Disclaimer: the following is entirely satire. Aaron: Did Nephites really practice Christmas? The answer might be less straightforward than you think, because critics of the LDS church have pointed out that the Book of Mormon says that Nephites were separated from the Old World centuries prior to the rise of not only Christmas as a holiday but the Christian religion as a whole. But that's what we're going to talk about today, especially because this actually turns into kind of a surprising evidence in favor  of the Book of Mormon when you actually get to the bottom of the criticism and what the actual evidence says. So Mason, did Nephites celebrate Christmas? Mason:  Uh, well, obviously, they're Christians, they don't just practice "happy holidays." Aaron, Mason, Dean: *laughing* Mason: Only joking, and it's important to note that we aren't going to know for sure what festivals developed in the Nephite civilization. Dean: We do have a good idea abo...
Post a Comment
Read
e
Link copied!